ADVICE ON DISCUSSING SEX DIFFERENCES All. I use a consistent strategy to prevent

ADVICE ON DISCUSSING SEX DIFFERENCES
All.
I use a consistent strategy to prevent accusations of bias or agenda in matters of sex differences.

1) Evolution out of necessity favored compatibility not equality. In fact, it’s counter intuitive, but the greater divergence in cognitive bias between the sexes the greater the opportunity field of discovery of advantage AND compromise for reciprocal benefit. This law is universal at all scales of life, but is much more advantageious among sentient, aware, and conscious creatures.

2) Whenever possible, when discussing the behaviors of either sex bias, (a) use first principles construction, and (b) state both the construction of the female bias and the male bias. (use my columnar chart for help).

3) Explain why this division of the labor of sense, perception (disambiguation), world modeling (synthesis), auto association, prediction, valuation, attention, and choice, into time and reproductive resopnsibility for which kinds of capital mitigating which kind of risk, are an evolutionary necessity and if functioning, an advantage.

WHY OUR WORK IS NECESSARY
People outside of our organization and it’s followers (students) are not able to make use of this technique because they lack the scientific knowledge of the many disciplines necessary to produce it and reduce it to both first priciples, and a system of measurement, that provides universal commensurability across all sciences (well, accross all the grammars – which means across all human knoweldge and experience.)

Cheers

Reply addressees: @NWEurasian @AutistocratMS @spaceangelvoice @ezra_tezra @StephenThomasHC