Robert, (all): I would argue free ‘truthful, reciprocal, testifiable speech’ – w

Robert, (all):
I would argue free ‘truthful, reciprocal, testifiable speech’ – where truthful requires that truth and reciprocity claims are ‘testifiable’, is the hole in the law.
And that this hole in the law exists becuause until the past decade or so, we could not test, in the constraints of the court, whether a statement was truthful and tesifiably so.
Plugging that hole in the law would effectively eliminate all leftist speech, since it always and everywhere consists of violations of truth,reciprocity, and testifiability.
As for the moral questions, if we acknowldge that the intergenerational family is of higher policy and law priority than the individual’s personal fulfillment of their instincts, intuitions, and desires – then all the two socially offensive questions positied in the graphic: satan worship and trans story hour that you posted would be crimes, but the rest would not.

Reply addressees: @BobMurphyEcon