I completely understand. Really. And I’ll happily block you to protect you from

I completely understand. Really.
And I’ll happily block you to protect you from it. 😉
But seriously, my work looks like english, but it’s more akin to mathematics: it’s an operational logic constructed from the heirarchy of first principles (scientific laws) that emerge in a predictable pattern as complexity increases from subatomic physicsl thruogh life through our most complex thoughts. The best analogy is a descriptive programming language, except it’s a descriptive programming language for everything.
If I used symbolism like say, mathematics, set logic, or chemistry you wouldn’t be troubled by it. But because I write it as we used to write mathematics and presently write programming, in ‘pseudocode’ you think you should understand it – but you don’t because you can’t.
On average it takes a 140IQ about a year to grasp it. If you have knowledge of a hard science, and some training in either the scientific method or economics it’s a bit easier.
If you *DO* want to understand it, you’ll need to watch the Methods, Foundations, Choice and Thoughts videos.
The method describes the methodology.
The Foundations describes how it’s applied.
The Choice describes our current crisis.
The Thoughts videos are commentary.
Otherwise do what everyone else does and plan on taking two to four years to undersetand it all.
And as a consequence … understand EVERYTHING. And obtain the mindfulness that results from understanding everything.

So I’m sympathetic. Really.
But this turns out to be what’s necessary to solve the problem of the age, the crisis of the age, and to implement a law that prevents a repetition of this problem and crisis.

Cheers 😉

Reply addressees: @smugalongsmugly