That is a feminine interpretation given that you believe people are driven by em

That is a feminine interpretation given that you believe people are driven by emotions. Aside from being marginally autistic I do not have those emotions. I’m driven by a very simple instict as a student of behavioral economics and the law, to eliminate conflict, maximize cooperation, by continuing the thousands of years of history of the incremental suppression of irreciprocity producing incremental advances in human cooperation.

My work is largely reducible to epistemology, truth, and reciprocity. The rest is rather technical work in logic and law. And no it is not easy to understand, unless you already have a college degree in a hard science and have at least studied scientific epistemology and the scientific method -which are othing other than the science of producing testifialbe testimony (truth), which incrementally discoveres forst principles. And from first principles we can create a universally commensturable logic of falsification with which to test the truthfulness of all statements.

So you, given your instinct, intuition, expereince and knowledge are logically projecting the same cognition upon me – when in fact you probably have never met, and never will meet someone of my nature because we are very rare – and worse, I am a polymath in nearly every discipline (I don’t like chemistry for some reason – probably lab work in school) so you will not find almost anyone with my range of knowledge. (I’m in my early sixties).

The universe is very simple to me. It is very simple to anyone who studies my work. But my work is quite difficult and it takes quite a bit of effort. Partly because unlearing everything wrong is harder than learning anything new.

Reply addressees: @Adc_Van_Dimsal @_amitbehere