“husbands are outcompeted by money. Children are also outcompeted by money”– I

–“husbands are outcompeted by money. Children are also outcompeted by money”–

I didn’t take it that far, but yes. More abstractly, you mean that women are, instinctually, selfish, consumption, stimulation, attention, status, signaling, gossiping, and hypergamy wh–rs that have no more self regulation than five year olds with candy in matters of society, economy, and politics – unless they have four or more children. There is a reason women have those instincts and without it applied to children as a regulator at ten, and as a mother before they’re fully mature at twenty-two, the evidence is that this spirals into catastrophe for society, economy, polity, and civilization. Pandora didn’t get the punishment she deserved. And we have given her the box, by the ballot.

And no, I absolutely hate knowing this – and it’s the one painful truth that I have most personally resisted. I wish desperately for the return of women to the pedestal. And that’s despite that as far as I know one of my most important contributions to the history of thought is to reduce all human differences to sex differences in cognition and behavior. So, while reducing all biology to evolution was controversial. Reducing all social science to demonstrated intersts (property) is something most rebel against. Reducing all human behavioral sciencde to sex differences in cognition is — well, I expect more hate directed at me than Darwin, Galileo, and Aristotle combined. 😉

Reply addressees: @RanjitCordeiro @decofuturism