It’s just that you’re not a polymath so you are stuck in on frame of reference, and I am a polymath so all methodologies are just variations on operational language. Even that concept, I assume, is quite a bit beyond you because it’s beyond almost everyone.
If you can learn the hierarchy mathematical models and techniques such that you grasp it’s nothing but the science of creating projections that function as a set of constructible baselines for producing commensurability regardless of the number of dimensions, then you should be able to grasp what we’re talking about. But you may lack the domain knowledge to grasp that we’ve unified the sciences in to universally commensurable value-neutral paradigm vocabulary and logic. Most people in our domain requires about 140IQ and at least two domains of knowledge. Usually, one of them is economics because with economics and computation vs physics and mathematics, we see the methodological difference between the physical and behavioral sciences.
Reply addressees: @Ket_Math_Dad @EricMorganCoach @Viorp2 @WerrellBradley @AntonyArakkal1 @Sargon_of_Akkad
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-01 00:16:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697403084153016320
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697400317674139744
Leave a Reply