Accusation: Curt: “Your ancestors couldn’t develop _one_ useful theoretical fram

–Accusation: Curt: “Your ancestors couldn’t develop _one_ useful theoretical framework, and so now y’all are stuck with a million disparate attempts in the present, among which your’s is just one.”–

I don’t understand this argument – it appears that you are suggesting that we should produce a monopoly framework instead of the market for frameworks in competition under natural, common, concurrent law – when the evidence is that the Muslims and the Hindus succeeded in producing a monopoly, only to kill both civilization’s intellectual movements – India first by 100, and Islam a few hundred years later by 900, leading to stagnation and dysgenia. The Muslims produced universal underclass subservience and froze, then declined. The Hindus produced class as a military hierarchy and froze. The Chinese produced harmony and, despite their geography, resources, insulation from barbarians, scale and exceptional government, they stagnated. And the Europeans produce heroic competition, the prohibition on authority by the preservation of sovereignty, all mediated by common natural law. And in doing so, produced adaptive and innovative velocity that dragged the rest of y’all kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, disease, child mortality and early death – kicking and screaming and hating us for it.

And yes, you are ungrateful. Because you’re insulted that your history, and the values that you so cherish are of comparative failure. It’s understandable. It’s natural.

Yes, we are currently fighting off the Marxist-seqeuence’s pseudoscientific reinvention of Abrahamic supernatural religion. And yes, because we rely on natural law, commonality, and concurrency, we must produce all this chaos in order to finally come to a consensus on ending it. And yes, the Romans failed, and we might fail as they did (we’re close to it). But we might just have yet another of the common European ‘reformations’ leading to ‘revolutions’ and rapidly restoring our historical trajectory.

Our way is messy and public and confusing and even stressful – but it continuously evolves – meaning despite being the youngest race and youngest civilization, we are the fastest – leaving all others behind in the dust in all three of the ages: bronze, iron, and steel.

In evolution, being first doesn’t matter. Only being fastest.

So if you have an argument, I don’t see it.

Reply addressees: @yaduraya @SameeraKhan @hbdchick