WHAT’S WRONG WITH THE UK? The British political and economic problem is the infl

WHAT’S WRONG WITH THE UK?
The British political and economic problem is the influence of the lower classes, which roughly works out to be ‘labor’ and those that agitate them in the talking classes. When combined with the problem of the centralization of London and the conversion of London (and Birmingham for that matter) into a cosmopolitan city-state at the expense of the rest of the population, by selling off london property and rentals to foreigners. I mean, without London the UK is as poor as America’s poorest states Alabama and Mississippi. This isn’t profit it’s capital destruction.

This is a similar example of the american decline that’s more American Regional vs Non-American Cosmopolitan in the major immigrant cities we call Sh*thole Cities. The UK, rural Canada, and the US all face similar problems for similar reasons: our capital investment in our urban centers has been sold off to the financial sector, the political sector, and immigrants who have no interest in the continuation of the high-trust germanic civilizational polities that our ancestors created and we inherited. The globalists give the enemies of the people the pseudo-moral justification of anti-nationalism as a means of extracting these profits by not increasing prosperity but extracting and spending down physical, social, and genetic capital.

This lower class ‘infection’ of the middle classes and politics in the UK is similar to the problem in America as the dysfunction of the dependent black culture gradually infected the underclass, working, and lower-middle-class culture in the states.

The upper financial class ‘infection’ of the middle classes in both the USA and the UK occurred at about the same time just after 1900 as both countries created the most stable LEGAL SYSTEM using the Common Concurrent Law, and Rule of Law under it (american formal constitutional law, as science, and the supremacy of it defended by the supreme court, is superior to British informal constitutional law as tradition, and the supremacy of parliament in the absence of a supreme court. Otherwise, the monarchy-prime_minister-cabinet-multi-house parliamentary-debate-and-party system in the UK is superior. to the president, cabinet, multi-house, two-party system, SPEECH and two-party system in the States.

Note that the British use middle-class for the american equivalent of upper-middle-class so the terms aren’t quite equivalent. The British class system is even more culturally descriptive given the obviousness of clas, while the american system more politically and economically useful because it describes one’s capacity to bear responsibility for occupation and assets, and we separate social(behavior) and economic(income) class though they remain near neighbors.

The interesting psychological bit is this dependency culture created by the celebration of the British health care, unemployment, and credit system, under which taking advantage of each is a virtue signal – and lacks the discipline and shared conservative of the German equivalents (who frankly work harder), and neither possesses the american entrepreneurial culture which considers participation in such schemes a personal and moral failure.

So the strength of the UK consists largely in the upper middle, lower upper, and upper classes carrying the country more so than the states, which is carried traditionally by the middle classes (and that’s why the left is at war against the middle class in the states.)

Cheers

Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation

Reply addressees: @ZILCHEROONY @TruthFinder04 @BladeoftheS