(IMO Nietzsche’s criticisms are correct, his primary insight in his first book i

(IMO Nietzsche’s criticisms are correct, his primary insight in his first book is the need for our western restoration. But few people understand him thoroughly because they’re looking for what isn’t there. Nietzche didn’t solve the problem he set out to. He didn’t. He couldn’t. He could only tell us what it might feel like if we did. I would argue we are still trying to complete the 19th-century Darwinian revolution and the classical restoration, but the Marxists have been selling snake oil precisely because all the past thinkers never succeeded sufficiently to counter them.
Now, IMO (and I don’t know anyone who understands this better than I do) the information was sitting under our noses – it just wasn’t in philosophical or theological form, and unfortunately, there is a deep need for supernatural or ideal sentiments that justify emotions rather than explain the solutions rationally.
I’m more worried about ending the Marxist-to-woke cult than anything else. Because it’s what’s prohibiting our restoration = because our restoration requires responsibility and the entire leftist corpus is a promise of irresponsibility and freedom from the laws of nature – which of course, is not only false, but suicidal. No more dark ages please.)

Reply addressees: @CCrowley100 @QuixoteSword