(fascinating ai nonsense) I asked GPT4 to list the properties of proto-life. (BT

(fascinating ai nonsense)

I asked GPT4 to list the properties of proto-life. (BTW: it misses one of the properties: independence, which is a common failing in the literature.)

Then I asked it to repeat the list my style. (It knows my work).

That contrast was interesting, both in word choice and sentence structure. This example doesn’t produce an opportunity for enumerations (lists). And it still uses ambiguous terms that I avoid such as “…a key feature..”.

—

“Ok. so how would we define proto-life?”

ChatGPT
Proto-life, as the term suggests, refers to entities that exhibit some, but not all, characteristics of life. These entities are often considered precursors to life or life-like but not fully alive by the complete definition. Here’s a possible definition:

Proto-life refers to systems or structures that:

Exhibit some level of organization, often at a molecular level, which may include self-assembly or self-organization.

Can undergo certain metabolic-like processes, such as catalysis or energy transfer, but may not have a full metabolic system.

Can maintain some form of homeostasis, often in terms of maintaining physical or chemical stability.

Can grow or increase in complexity under certain conditions.

Can replicate or reproduce in some manner, often through simple physical or chemical processes rather than biological reproduction.

Can respond to stimuli in a basic way, often through simple physical or chemical changes rather than complex biological responses.

Can evolve or change over time, often through processes like molecular evolution or self-organization.

However, proto-life entities do not meet the criteria of being an independent organism capable of conducting all life-sustaining processes on their own. Examples of proto-life might include certain types of complex molecules, self-replicating molecules, or simple molecular systems that exhibit some life-like properties.

—

Can you please repeat that list in the style of philosopher and social scientist curt doolittle?

ChatGPT
Certainly, here’s an attempt to frame the definition of proto-life in the style of Curt Doolittle:

Proto-life refers to entities that:

Exhibit a degree of organization, often at a molecular level, demonstrating the ability to self-assemble or self-organize, thereby manifesting a form of order that is a fundamental characteristic of life.

Engage in metabolic-like processes, such as catalysis or energy transfer, but may not possess a complete metabolic system, thus demonstrating a rudimentary form of the energy transformation processes that are central to life.

Maintain a form of homeostasis, often in terms of physical or chemical stability, indicating a basic capacity for self-regulation, a key feature of life.

Grow or increase in complexity under certain conditions, showing a primitive form of the growth and development processes that characterize life.

Replicate or reproduce in some manner, often through simple physical or chemical processes rather than biological reproduction, indicating a basic form of the reproduction process that is a defining feature of life.

Respond to stimuli in a basic way, often through simple physical or chemical changes rather than complex biological responses, demonstrating a rudimentary form of the responsiveness to the environment that characterizes life.

Evolve or change over time, often through processes like molecular evolution or self-organization, showing a primitive form of the evolutionary change that is a fundamental characteristic of life.

However, these entities do not meet the criteria of being an independent organism capable of conducting all life-sustaining processes on their own, thus they represent a form of ‘proto-life’, a precursor or rudimentary form of life.