Carlos, As someone much older that has been involved for decades, your outline l

Carlos,
As someone much older that has been involved for decades, your outline looks about correct.

Only reaction I had going through it, is that you’re using abstract names for physical processes and regions in the brain, and you might consider “physical thing as abstract name” section heads – this would anchor (legitimize) your framing.

Something akin to:
Sensation (nerves) as …..
Disambiguation (neural columns) as …..
Adversarial Organization (rear and side neocortex) as …..
Episodic Modeling (hippocampal(indexing)) as …..
Autoassociative Prediction (hippocampal vs neocortex)as …..
Adversarial Valuation (neocortex, thalamus, brain stem) as …..
Attention capture (Thalamus) as …..
Executive function (prefrontal cortex) as …..
Recursion (working memory, recursion (wayfinding)) as …..

Just a suggestion so that you aren’t written off as philosophizing independent of physical causality instead of trying to communicate effectively to the reader.

Curt

Reply addressees: @dela3499