Now, why you’re confused (as is common) about the meaning of ‘law’ as in laws of the universe.
This is a long standing problem in western thought even though western thought is far superior to the thought in every other civilization – we still have a few issues.
So let’s understand what’s possible to describe by what system of description (measurement).
|Sequence|: Sets(Identification, Logic) > Math(Descriptions), Computation(Operations) > Simulation (Adversarial Competition)
1. Set Reducibility (Language, Logic)
2. Mathematical Reducibility (Physics)
3. Computational Reducibility (Behavior)
4. Simulational Reducibility (Evolution)
How does prediction change in that sequence?
Why do we need each increase in precision?
What dimensions are we adding with each increase in precision?
See? 😉
Reply addressees: @justinmchase
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-27 16:53:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1673736283775025169
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1673734153542549512
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
Yes, because when we refer to “The Method”, we’re referring to producing sequences of terms as measurements by the process of ‘disambiguation by enumeration, operationalization, aversarial competition, and serialization’, thereby creating a discreet definition of a term.
Science consists of the means of producing testifiable testimony by production of falsifiable operations. Scientific statesments contain two properties: the formula (description) and search criteria (context).
There are four sciences: the physical (before state), behavioral (during state), evolutionary (after state), and the formal science (the logics) we describe those states with.
All four sciences are constructable from the one first principle (first law) of the ternary logic of evolutionary computation by the defeat of entropy by the concentration of energy consisting of positive, negative charges in stable persistent organizations.
All language consitsts of measurements of levels of ambiguous to unambiguous precision, using the same rule of evolutionary computation by continous recursive disambiguation of ambiguity into meaning: agreement (or not): “stable relations”
Ergo language is just an extension of the same rules that all the rest of the universe operates by – because thats how our neurons operate, because that’s how molecules operate – etc.
The “grammars”, from unambiuous (math) to ambiguous(deception) consists of paradigms (permissible dimensions), vocabulary, and syntax for communication by some measurment wiether precise, imprecise, or associative, or misleading.
Natural Law = The science, and logic of cooperation (non conflict) by the production of a universally commensurable value neutral paradigm, vocabulary, and logic of decidability.
We use the term natural law because it completes the aristotelian project of the same name. And is the foundation behind the common, concurrent law of europeans and british and american constitutions in particular.
We have merely ‘scienced’ that law, and plugged holes in that constitution by doing so.
This completes the wilsonian synthesis of the unification of the sciences.
So our work is quite important – on the scale of the Darwinian Revlution.
And social media was one of the most useful research tools because we can ‘experiement’ with language and behavior cheaply and quickly by the collection of demonstrated (good) rather than reported (bad) behavior.
Cheers
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1673734153542549512
Leave a Reply