Not sure how you got to my ideas being laws of the universe. Instead that the la

Source date (UTC): 2023-06-18 01:27:30 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670241796532719616

Reply addressees: @dosontheshinshi @MudKevin @Barbarian_Brain

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670119354057326595

IN REPLY TO:

Unknown author

CORRECTIONS
1 – We can adapt a population’s IQ in as few as three and no more than six generations simply by reducing the bottom and repeat criminals – and the bottom is a huge drag on society, economy, and politics, and criminals are worse.
2 – It certainly appears that education in the sciences, converting many particular rules to a few general universal rules improved not iq, but demonstrated intelligence, by a half to a full standard deviation.
3 – It certainly appears that education in our work (don’t worry about it) in logical and behavioral science does about the same as did the physical sciences.
4 – No population on earth is prohibited from near to western or eastern success if they increase their IQ by education and regulated reproduction, and the rule of law that performs natural selection as a consequence.
5 – No population can adhere to natural law and achieve economic, social, and political prosperity without either the resource curse or raising their average IQ above ~92 to 95. And the higher above 100, the better, because only people above 105 can learn by reading instructions, repair machines, or self educate. And economic complexity is increasing every year, meaning intellectual demands on a population increase every year.

I don’t make the laws of the universe. But it’s my job and the job of our organization to try to prevent people from lying about the laws of the universe, and the consequences for mankind when we try to evade them.

Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1670119354057326595