Um. Pseudoscience. Backward. And by someone who is irrelevant. She’s discussing

Um. Pseudoscience. Backward. And by someone who is irrelevant. She’s discussing the fact that the size of differences in brain regions is limited. That does not mean the connection and transmission isn’t signfigant.

We don’t ‘trust the science’ because that means’ trust the scientists’ when there is just as logarithmic a distribution in the competency of scientists as every other profession.

A great deal of my work codifies sex differences in perception, auto association, valuation, prediction, cognition, and attention.

Contrary to the pseudoscientific postwar movement to deny differences by the marxist-sequence of pseudo intellectuals, all differences in human behavior are reducible to sex differences in cognition, and sex differences in cognition are reducible to a very small number of variables: predator vs prey, longitudinal speed of valuation vs lateral breadth of valuation, systemic vs empathic, operational vs verbal, over time vs in time, productive and capitalizing vs hyperconsumptive, and status by responsibility for commons vs status by seeking irresponsibility for the commons. That’s really all there is to it.

Same for big 5/6 personality traits vs facets.

Sorry. No more lies. End the century of pseudoscience.

Reply addressees: @URyourauthority @SwipeWright