“The continental tradition got lost in Transcendental Historicism.”– –“The big

–“The continental tradition got lost in Transcendental Historicism.”–
–“The big questions are dismissed as irrelevant.”–
–“I see the possibility of getting past this.”–
–“I am a naturalist in that there is no higher thing.”–
–Zizek

Hmm. He doesn’t say much other than criticism but some of his criticism is worth the effort. 😉

It’s a lot easier to explain that philosophy is the bridge between theology and science(economics, law) just as theology is the bridge between mythology and philosophy.

I don’t see what I do as philosophy, but it does answer the three categorical questions of existence, epistemology, and preference (or the good)

I just see it as explaining in textual terms ordinal computation. So if philosophy is explanation and science is causation, then that’s fine. But as far as I know, philosophy is now limited to choice within the limits discovered by science. And science can only say what is good and true, it cannot say which good to choose.