WHAT DO WE MEAN BY MONARCHY? –“It’s not even, technically speaking, a monarchy

WHAT DO WE MEAN BY MONARCHY?

–“It’s not even, technically speaking, a monarchy if the monarch doesn’t have a final say, make the exceptions and interpretations.” – Martin Stepan (@TheAutistocrat)

Agreed.
0. Kingdom (non european)
1. … monarchy (christian european, c.e.)
2. … … vs constitutional monarchy (c.e.)
3. … … … vs natural law constitutional monarchy.(c.e.)

Under the natural law modern state invented by the British, the monarchy is a via negative judge of last resort in the hierarchy of courts, that is outside the law only in the preservation and restoration of the law, the natural law, and the defense of the commons of the people.

Now you won’t find this explicitly stated by others because of the rather archaic romantic traditional, philosophical Christian and enlightenment framing of rights and obligations under the traditional law and traditional philosophy. It is, however, exactly how Elizabeth’s and now Charles’ rights, obligations, and inalienations are captured in British law.

(Why do I need to be the first person who does the grunt work of ‘sciencing’ anglo, germanic, and western civilization? 😉 )

Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute

Reply addressees: @TheAutistocrat