Sorry but you err. The federalist mission to restore the court, restore the legi

Sorry but you err. The federalist mission to restore the court, restore the legitimacy of law, by requiring all change go through the legislative process testing concurrency (agreement across regions and classes) reversing the legal positivism and activism of the Marxists, that undermined the law by bypassing the people the congress and due process. The result was unsettled law when the court, through commonality and the legislature through concurrency, are designed to require consensus in both the good (legislation) and the bad (judicial remedy).

So no. The whole point is to end your demand for authoritarianism and restore due process of legislative and legal change.

We have the legislature and we have the amendment process, and these require agreement across numbers, classes, and regions – specifically so we don’t result in unsettled law by authority whether false authority of the majority or false authority of the court or false authority of the legislature.

If you don’t understand these things then you are a threat to rule of law from which democracy is the means of determining concurrency: agreement.

Reply addressees: @LandSharkJones @TheRichFromCali