They are both reflections of sex differences in cognition with the feminine prey

They are both reflections of sex differences in cognition with the feminine prey response responsible for offspring and consumption in time seeking status by irresponsibiity for comons, vs the masculine predator stronger sex responsible for territory and resources over time seeking status by responsibility for commons. This is the origin (causality) of all human differences in cognitive bias. Everything else is neotenic evolution, genetic load, and developmental stress. So the disambiguation between oppression (social stress in hierarchy) and conspiracy (political stress by competitors) assists in maintaining causality (construction of all explanation from first principles (causes)).

You’re using the feminine framing in both cases. Males or Females may oppress females (actualy it’s domestication of their undermining, hyperconsumption and hypergamy). And Males may conspire to compete for dominance within group (to domesticate, to produce superior ends, or prey upon). But outsiders amplfiy the problem creating unity internally against externals (war). Hence the universal historical elite display of creating group cohesion through warfare whether the threat existed or not.

Reply addressees: @ViriatusII