Well I just defined the term so that you would understand it, as a ratio of resp

Well I just defined the term so that you would understand it, as a ratio of responsiblity to capital(resources). I think in and write in equilibria. In many things, such as reciprocity both sides of the equation are the same creating the equilibrium as a mirror. In other things, the equilibrium is not between people but between a positive and a negative, or between two scales. In this case between two dependent scales. You can’t have capital without defense (responsibilty) for producing maintaining using, and defending it. So you can accumulate or divest resources in relation to responsibility and accumulate and divest responsibility in relation to resources. Which is how I explain responsibility and sex differences in responsibility as the primary behavioral difference in social sciences:

Supply (resources) vs demand (responsibility)

AND
Supply (male) vs demand (female)
produced over time vs consumed in time
Producing polities vs producing offspring

Reply addressees: @TheAutistocrat @neoCamelist @WalterIII