RE: –“not understanding 1, 2, 3.”– RE: SIX/TEN REMAINING GREAT FLAWS IN HUMAN

RE: –“not understanding 1, 2, 3.”–
RE: SIX/TEN REMAINING GREAT FLAWS IN HUMAN THOUGHT
https://t.co/abAcaXY3jF

1) a) all logic is falsificationary: proofs test survival. b) we learn about the universe through incremental removal of human error. c) All human error originates with the the consequences of embodiment, anthropomorphism, and the problem of mathiness (ideal) vs computation (real).

2) There is one law to the universe and using constructive proofs (falsification of all alternatives), by this one law (evolutionary computation), we can test for deviations from this rule, that allows us to create universally commensurability as a single science (unification of the sciences) rather than the crisis of today, which is specialization in those deviations from universal commensurability – ie: why physics, cog sci, psychy, soc, econ, fail. (Note that as an example, we don’t think of geometry, which is reducible to the laws of the triangle, as a constructive logic of falsification, but it is and it is consistent with the ternary logicl of evolutionary computation.)

3) All human behavior originates in sex differences. Most of human history consists of solving political (male) questions in the public sphere while reserving familial and interpersonal (female) questions to the private sphere. As such cog sci, psych, soc, econ, pol are based on the false premise of variation from the male mean. However, with the introgression of women, we have admized female cognitive and male biases without a means of creating a market for the resolutoin of conflicts between the opposites of female in time empathizing, vs male over time systematizing. As such the purpose of all behavioral sciences is not gender neutrality, or gender priority, but gender EXCHANGE. This is a huge leap in moral thought from golden mean to behavioral supply and demand between polar opposites. And where the opposites and the spectrum between them create a field of evolutionary computation across time and space that maxmizes human innovation cooperation and trade, maximizing human evolution. Where seeking the ideal person like any other ‘false aggregate’ will result in stagnation and decline – which is the lesson of both abrahamic-series religions and marxist-series ideologies.