2 – c) the scholistics were horrified by the new world slaughter, and d) the church was exceptionally interested in education and conversion. 3) so it is more accurate to say that colonialism was a continuation of “Heroism, Rule for Profit”, just as was practiced by China.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-04 16:09:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/981564445351727110
Reply addressees: @JulesWarr @neovictorian23
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/981563939367587842
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@JulesWarr @neovictorian23 1 – False dichotomy. a) Aryanism (since the time of the Yamna) has always been expansionary and to some degree, messianic. b) the principle purpose of expanding trade was not originally enrichment so much as creating trade interdependence in order to limit war.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/981563939367587842
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@JulesWarr @neovictorian23 1 – False dichotomy. a) Aryanism (since the time of the Yamna) has always been expansionary and to some degree, messianic. b) the principle purpose of expanding trade was not originally enrichment so much as creating trade interdependence in order to limit war.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/981563939367587842
Leave a Reply