Not an argument. Not the least because Chomsky was half right. Evolutionary comp

Not an argument.
Not the least because Chomsky was half right.
Evolutionary computation by Continuous Recursive Disambiguation from entropy(quantum background, disorder) into stable relations (matter, order), is the universal cause and it must be as it is the only possible cause.
As for ruliads, this is term for performing continuous recursive disambiguation from entropy to negative entropy. However it’s most frequently discussed as a computational model but an ideal model, because it (usually) ignores the dimensions of (a) sequence within the rule (b) probability (c) resource availability and when not in competition (a game, simulation), absent adversarial selection.
I understand this topic of verbal mathematics, vs operational computation, vs adversarial competition vs linguistic communication, vs deception as different logics and grammars, as well as anyone, and sometimes I feel like I’d do a better job than Wolfram at explaining what he’s trying to communicate. Precisely because I came at the problem from the opposite direction of ‘sciencing’ lying, and as a consequence of mathematics as a trivial language, and the triviality of that language as placing definiable limits on both what can be described, and what errors can be made, and what deceptions be contrived.