Q: ~”Curt What currency would [a secessionist part of the country] use?” A: (bel

Q: ~”Curt What currency would [a secessionist part of the country] use?”
A: (below)

Understand a little more clearly:

Our (our organization’s) objective is to prevent what we see as a deterministic civil war, or continued disorganized, increasingly rapid collapse, by repeating the founding of the country with a Common Law suit against the state for the redress of grievances.

Our political system cannot scale to a domestic empire of this scale, especially when occupied as the world policemen of communication, finance, transport, and trade, without the support of the taxation produced by an equivalent empire.

We find it somewhat difficult to believe that the majority of the population would not prefer the solutions will propose – they benefit all at the expense of the federal bureaucracy, the predatory financial sector, the media, and the academy. And they radically alter our economy at least as significant as the Roman reforms.

But we have exhausted debate between our factions. We have exhausted the capacity of the electoral system to solve this question by voting. Will very likely exhaust the capacity of the courts to restore enough of the constitution that our problems are legally recoverable.

We are left, upon exhaustion of the courts, with a suit against the state (legislature) in a repetition of the founding fathers’ suit against the crown, culminating in the declaration of independence – or lastly, we are left with a bloody civil war none of us wants, but too many of us anticipate, and some look forward to with joy.

Why? We have learned that the industrial revolution has freed us not just of labor but of the social, political, and economic necessity of cooperation and compromise with those who have the feminine moral bias in favor of what we call communalism or communism and minimum responsibility for the average person, and what we call the masculine or republican or European tradition of maximization of responsibility for the average person.

In other words we are seeing an overwhelming want and need to choose opposite paths for our futures. This plays out in every domain of life, from the Scandinavian evidence that the more freedom we have to choose our futures, the less we compromise, and more we follow our natural instincts to feminine empathizing and masculine systematizing: the experience in time vs the outcomes over time.

So it’s time for a national divorce. We have run the experiment of the marxist, feminist, race-marxist sequence and we have ended up hating each other.

We no longer wish to live with people who hate us, who wish to eradicate our people, eradicate our traditions, and eradicate our culture, institutions, and history.

We wish you well in your continued experiment with the repetition of the mistakes of every other civilization in the world that led to equality in stagnation and poverty during the early middle ages.

We wish to restore the grand European tradition that made Europe a vast open air museum to the achievements of man, and that dragged mankind kicking and screaming out of superstition, ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, early death, violence, crime, and the vicissitudes of nature.

You are welcome to choose for yourselves.
You may not choose for us.
And we have no wish to choose for you.
And we can no longer pay the costs of your social destruction by the social construction of the false promise that there is an alternative to our traditions that will produce an equal or better outcome for all.

Our Christian religion is just natural law in theological garb. Our Constitution is just natural law in philosophical garb. In reality, it’s just physics under that theology and philosophy.

We live by the science of man – not the ideology that the science of man and the natural world can be altered by the social construction of a novel religion that is a mere repetition of those that have failed mankind for millennia.

Divorce it is.

-FIN-