PART II: THE SCIENCE OF DECIDABILITY APPLIED TO LAW In my work, I want to solve

PART II:

THE SCIENCE OF DECIDABILITY APPLIED TO LAW

In my work, I want to solve the problem of preserving decidability, the science of the natural law of cooperation, constitutions of it, common law, and concurrent legislation under it.

So in this sense, I judge constitutions, legislation, regulation, and command, by the science of decidability, the science of the natural law of cooperation (truth, reciprocity, ethics, morality), by their **Deviation from The Natural Law**, then judge whether the definition of law used, the constitution, it’s articles, the legislation, regulation under it, and the commands of the military or state in emergencies, et all are truthful, ethical, moral, and legitimate.

Now my work only says (a) what’s legitimate law( origin, constitution, legislation, regulation, command) (b) how to fix an illegitimate law. (c) and how to fix policies such that they are legal and legitimate.

So think of it as that there exits a hierarchy of courts, and I work on what would be the court of the law itself, rather than the court of the constitution (the supreme court), or the subsidiary courts (Criminal, Civil, Administrative, and Appeals.). Note that one of the US problems is that we don’t have an administrative court system for suits against the state and its actors.