3. This is profound, because anything not irreciprocal is either amoral or moral: a good. And groups train one another in their presumption of traditional ‘good’ claims in their group strategy. But it’s not those claims that matter, but their irreciprocal bads regardless of claim
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-19 15:06:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616089714314055682
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616089712745402370
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
2. This ‘via-negativa’ analysis – variation from truthful and reciprocal – isn’t tolerant or forgiving. And it explains why groups are superior in productivity or criminality. And explains why everything prosperous results from the institutional prosecution of the irreciprocal.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1616089712745402370
Leave a Reply