Most of the time I’ve torn apart the author so heavily by the first 1500 words that continuation is pointless. In this case just the first three sentences are … less than amateurish. Macdonad’s only weakness was in specializing in one stategy rather than comparative strategies
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 23:23:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973701230169067522
Reply addressees: @LibertyBrekfast @nathancofnas
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973700378230390784
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@LibertyBrekfast @nathancofnas Whether I ‘make sense’ or not depends on the scope of knowledge of the reader. And I made a very profound set of points in a relatively small number of words. That said, I’m happy to (and will) respond in long form. Tearing apart critiques like this is rather trivial.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/973700378230390784
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@LibertyBrekfast @nathancofnas Whether I ‘make sense’ or not depends on the scope of knowledge of the reader. And I made a very profound set of points in a relatively small number of words. That said, I’m happy to (and will) respond in long form. Tearing apart critiques like this is rather trivial.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/973700378230390784
Leave a Reply