Sorry but I can’t untangle that… But I think you might mean that without warranty of reciprocal insurance the incentive to refrain from imposition of costs doesn’t exist – and without sufficient scale is unenforceable. One needs enough insurers in order to ward off competitors.
Source date (UTC): 2018-01-24 01:19:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/955973324844224512
Reply addressees: @MartialSociety
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/955967690375512064
IN REPLY TO:
@MartialSociety
@curtdoolittle Under the “default aggression principle”, no person or group is entitled to a state of non-aggression without providing the necessary incentives to *not* “conquer, kill or enslave” them (reciprocity). So might gives a positional advantage that would make distinguishing between…
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/955967690375512064
Leave a Reply