So what the manosphere has demonstrated over that time (I guess about 15 to 20 years) is that (a) yes women’s wants are hyper-consumptive-gamic (b) endless, as is their penchant for unhappiness (c) and they assumed ‘more’ wouldn’t end up in market equilibration by men.
3/n
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-05 20:05:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1577751852732629012
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1577751850916495365
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
I’d find relationships, etc fulfilling. But I’d never crack the top 10% of influencers. Yet the ideas were still valuable at the time: women create a market for affection, but their hyperconsumption-gamy meant that they assumed all increases would be gains, not equilibrated.
2/n
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1577751850916495365
Leave a Reply