So, once you understand information, states, state machines, operational language, and then grasp that programming is a subset of the above,you see why P-Law looks and acts like a via-negativa (falsificationary) programming language that we can test for consistency (compilation).
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-30 18:32:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1454516459548385287
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1454493436892045320
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
Operationalism: Complete sentences, by using terms, in Continuous recursive disambiguation, traversing a chain of causation, by phrases, producing unambiguous transactions of changes in state.
This is what operationalism means. Testable chains of causality.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1454493436892045320
Leave a Reply