@hankbmartin Sure. But this is equally true for men. It’s just an asymmetric dis

@hankbmartin Sure. But this is equally true for men. It’s just an asymmetric distribution when many women have an intrinsic sex value, and fewer men have an extrinsic (developed) value, and even fewer men the combination of extrinsic and intrinsic value. So men have a few chads and women a near endless supply of the equivalent. Women have always been expensive. But now, compared to all of history, women are really, really, expensive. In other words, marriage is the first form of redistribution.