Read the Encyclopedia of Philosophy Entries (or Equivalent) 1 – Operationalism 2

Read the Encyclopedia of Philosophy Entries (or Equivalent)
1 – Operationalism
2 – The Emergence of First Order Logic
3 – Constructive Mathematics
4 – Intuitionism

In simple terms we must be able to construct a claim of the possibility of existence from a seuqence of operations each of which is dependent upon construction from, consistency with, continuity with, first prinicples.

Where as axioms(math) are declared (variable) and we seek to prove deducibility of a claim from declared, presumptive, or arbitrary premises. In science (Testimony) laws are discovered (invariant) and we seek to prove constructability from discovered, necessary, and invariant premises.

In other words, computable. Math favors idealism in pursuit of scale and context independence. Law requires realism (realism, naturalism, operationalism) because we are deciding human scale and context dependence.

In P-Law we eliminate the dependence on non-contradiction, and the law of the excluded middle that are necessary for independence of scale and context. And replace them with the law of continuous recursive disambiguation sufficient to satisfy the demand for decidability in the context.

Why? Becuase the physical sciences seek to explain, and the legal science seeks to identify ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, denial, deceit, fraud, crime, and war.