CRITICISM OF MY INTERPRETATION OF POPULATION GENETICS I got another supposed cri

CRITICISM OF MY INTERPRETATION OF POPULATION GENETICS

I got another supposed criticism last night without explaining what, from fans of population genetics. However, I can’t separate out their bias from anyone else’s. I have three people I can ask, but they have stopped participating, apparently because I won’t conform to their bias. That bias is to limit discussion to pop gen, and not further disambiguate by language, and further disambiguate by group competitive (evolutionary) strategy.

In other words, I’m solving for the big questions of
(a) where did technological competitiveness, paternalism, heroism and maneuver, truth and duty, sovereignty, reciprocity(property), commons, tort and jury, come from, (b) why, (c) how was it purified(west) or polluted (semitism), hinduism, buddhism.

I use the same research everyone else does. I just am solving for ‘the western group evolutionary strategy that produced sovereignty, law, reason, logic, empiricism, science, technology.

So I am interested in the civilizations, their technology, means of production, cooperation, and organization, and fighting.

Those groups that we think of as caucasian (really: west eurasian) are spread along the lower boundary of the ice from Spain to Mongolia (or even further?) (So does Caucasian mean west eurasian? the people of the caucuses today? the people that spread into the levant? the people north and west of the black sea? I try to avoid the term because it’s useless.)

The black sea is fresh water at that point and seems to be where the rapid evolution of west eurasians peaks, beaks into the IE expansion, and that in to north and west (european), south west (old european), from old european to Anatolian. And from caucuses east to the Tocharian, and south to the coastal middle east, and southeast into the Iranic peoples, then further east into the old indus river peoples (india).

Where did truth come from and why did we do it, and why didn’t anyone else? A coincidence: tech, animals, territory, economics, strategy (ooda-loop/maneuver), entrepreneurialism, law, debate, argument, reason, contract.

(continued…)