I take this to mean X is true, because x must be true. Is there some alternative interpretation?
How do I operationalize the statement? and what is an example of it being operationalized?
In other words, how to convert it from abstract analogy to testable case and first cause.
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-09 18:17:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1359204817093226497
Reply addressees: @Imperius__13
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1356616502854746116
Leave a Reply