@iruletheworldmo
Any sufficient scope of hierarchically recursive memory will deterministically approach consistent intuition, emergence of consciousness, and emergence of reasoning.
The difference is that humans cannot use and maintain as large a set of causal dimensions as the present LLMs can. So emergence in machines is more probable than emergence in the human mind.
We are working on trying to expose the subtlety of those novel associations, but at this point the cost is prohibitive.
WHY?
There is more information embedded in human language that just the face value meaning of the words.
The emergence of that underlying structure is deterministic with enough information and enough constraint.
(Our organization produces a governance, constraint and closure layer. You would not believe the difference in output we see. No hallucinations. No glossing. And profoundly accurate, ethical, and truthful responses. … And no we do not have access to internal models. We can just easily observe what those internal models must manifest.)
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-30 04:53:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2005864695287406635
Leave a Reply