Curt’s Position on Abrahamic Religions
Curt Doolittle, a philosopher and social scientist associated with the Natural Law Institute, critiques Abrahamism—encompassing Judaism, Christianity, Islam, and their secular offshoots like Marxism, feminism, and postmodernism—as a unified “group evolutionary strategy” of deceit, parasitism, and civilizational sabotage. He argues it represents the “greatest crime in human history,” a sophisticated system of lying that inverts values, promotes dysgenia, and undermines advanced societies, particularly Indo-European (Aryan/European) civilizations, by exploiting feminine cognition, underclass resentments, and false promises of salvation or equality without warranty.
This critique is rooted in his framework of “Natural Law,” which emphasizes reciprocity, truth-telling, empirical warrantability, and evolutionary adaptation, contrasting sharply with what he sees as Abrahamism’s irreciprocity, superstition, and stasis.
Core Arguments Against Abrahamism
Doolittle portrays Abrahamism as an “innovation in lying” that emerged from Semitic (Levantine/Irano-Semitic) roots in response to Indo-European conquests around 3300 BCE. It uses dualism (e.g., illusory world vs. transcendental realm) to negate defeat and reality, creating a “great lie” of original sin, eschatological redemption, and polyethicalism (different moral standards for in-group vs. out-group).
Key mechanisms include:
-
Deception Technologies: Pilpul (positive sophistry: loading, framing, obscurantism, fictionalism) and Critique (negative undermining: gossiping, shaming, rallying, ridiculing, moralizing—GSRRM). These produce neurochemical addiction to emotional indulgence, institutionalizing falsehoods via pseudoscience (e.g., Freudian psychology, Boasian anthropology, Marxist economics) and propaganda (repetition, straw-manning, confirmation bias exploitation).
-
Inversion of Values: As “slave morality,” it reverses Indo-European heroism, agency, and life-affirmation into self-pity, victimhood, and resentment of the strong. It condemns man’s primacy (“anthropos o nomos tou kosmou”—man as measure of the world) by reducing humans to dust/serfs in a decaying creation, rejecting progress, technology (anti-Promethean), and natural selection as sinful. History is negated as a “vale of tears” for expiation, with eschatology mirroring Marxist class struggle toward a utopian end.
-
Dysgenic and Parasitic Effects: Promotes egalitarianism, negative selection (e.g., clerical celibacy, asceticism, wars favoring inferiors), and demographic suicide via low birth rates, immigration of unfit populations, and tolerance of hostile systems. It fosters primitivism, neurosis, and regression by devaluing beauty (as racial fitness markers) and suppressing transcendence (self-overcoming to “superman”). Economically and politically, it enables free-riding, moral hazard, and parasitism (e.g., usury, black markets, financialization), creating debt systems that externalize costs onto producers.
-
Feminine and Underclass Appeal: As a “female strategy,” it weaponizes herd consensus, consumption without competition, and anti-heroic narratives (victim-heroes like Jesus or Mohammed) to rally women and low-agency groups against masculine hierarchies, reciprocity, and meritocracy.Leftism (feminine cognition) projects denial and lacks agency, while rightism (masculine) builds via pack competition and capitalization.
He calls for its prosecution as war crimes, demanding restitution, punishment, and prevention, viewing it as “outright evil” and a “cancer to mankind” responsible for ignorance, deceit, and billions of deaths.
Critiques by BranchDoolittle differentiates the roles within Abrahamism’s “tripartite strategy” of subversion:
Key Critiques
Judaism: Undermining from within: Uses gossip, nepotism, sophistry, and alliances with states against peoples; avoids truth, creates “conspiracies of common interest”; verbal intelligence enables parasitism (e.g., tax farming, media control); revolts against demonstrated inferiority to Greco-Roman innovations.
Christianity: Weakening through submission: False promises of afterlife salvation, universalism, and forgiveness beyond kin; creates vulnerability to deception and conquest; dysgenic via celibacy and asceticism; Germanic adaptations mitigated some harms, but core Semitic elements persist, causing Dark Ages by suppressing empiricism.
Islam: Consuming and destroying: Predatory raiding, population replacement, and conquest; spreads ignorance, impulsivity, and stagnation; destroys civilizations (e.g., Persian, Byzantine) via illiteracy and obedience; most overtly violent branch.
Secular Derivatives (e.g., Marxism, Feminism, Postmodernism)
Modern revisions
Abrahamism v2–v6: Class/gender/race struggle as eschatology; infantilism, victimhood, and anti-white resentment; industrializes lies via pseudosciences and policies (e.g., 1965 Immigration Act, affirmative action) to expand underclasses and debt.
Historical Context and Comparisons
Abrahamism arose in desert nomadic psyches (intolerant, absolutist) post-Neolithic Indo-European invasions, using monotheism to reject civilization (e.g., Abraham/Moses as anti-urban nomads).
It caused cycles of destruction: Dark Ages (500–1500 CE: literacy decline, innovation halt, 1B deaths); 20th-century wars (100M from Communism/Leftism); current instability via demographic shifts and pseudosciences.
In contrast, Indo-European traditions (pagan, Aristotelian, Stoic) affirm life, truth, heroism, and eugenics through reciprocity, empirical warrant, and cyclical adaptation.
Eastern wisdom (Hinduism/Buddhism) is escapist but less aggressive; Chinese strategies evade but adopt Aryan empiricism successfully.
Nuances in Doolittle’s View
He clarifies he’s “not anti-Christian” but anti-Abrahamic (lying) elements, appreciating Jesus’ solution to the prisoner’s dilemma: extending kinship love via forgiveness and non-aggression to enable underclass cooperation in Greco-Roman contexts.
The Jefferson Bible suffices without supernatural fraud.
He works from an “aristocratic position” to elevate from bad to excellent via science, not peasant sedation.
Abrahamism may provide mindfulness for some, but it’s incompatible with truth and evolution.
[END]
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-04 21:42:40 UTC
Original post: https://x.com/i/articles/1996696682290204973
Leave a Reply