Understood. But like I said. There are paradigms and gramars of those paradigms.

Understood. But like I said. There are paradigms and gramars of those paradigms. And we can produce ‘private language’ paradigms, subdiscipline and disciplinary paradigms, or convergent (universal) paradigms.
So while I can translate your paradigm, and the rather deep consistency of it, I don’t think that ability (or incentive) is all that common. :
I had to re-compose my work in libertarian, philosophical, scientific, operational, and technical frames. And IMO the most comprehensible is the technical. I dont get to choose what people’s frame of reference is. I have to write INTO theirs. This is the barrier to your work. It may need the equivalent of an idiot’s guide translating it to secular prose to validate it such that the spiritual prose is legitimized enough to expand your audience. 😉 -hugs