RE: —“MacDonald’s GES is a starting hypothesis. Doolittle’s work renders it ac

RE: —“MacDonald’s GES is a starting hypothesis. Doolittle’s work renders it actionable law.”—

This is my understanding of the correct interpretation of our works – compatible. IMO MacDonald is much more understandable by the vox populi but to render it into law requires my work. 😉

Thanks for your work on thise matters.