I think that I am nearly always misunderstood when I discuss this, as the differ

I think that I am nearly always misunderstood when I discuss this, as the difference between the grammar (means of conveying the logic) the content of it, and the derrogatory affects on the aristocracy that is where all the ‘good’ in the west came from. The fact that christianity, despite all its harms, made possible the unificadtion of the aristocracy, peasants women, and slaves, by making them capable of virtue without possessing the same abilities as the aristocracy. In other words chrsitanity gave teh bottom a means of virtue in a civilization where virtue was limited to aristoxratic traits. The fact that most of christianity is actually plato, and is a counter-revolution against greek and roman law, is probably lost on everyone but the few who study such things. THe truth is the truth. Christianity was originally conveyed and still is by feminine submission, sophistry, and supernatural nonsense does not necessarily detract that a christian with an 80IQ is still a good person, and that cannot be said of the same IQ under any other religion.