Mark Tegmark (@tegmark) RE: —“Those limits are 30 levels above where we are no

Mark Tegmark (@tegmark)

RE: —“Those limits are 30 levels above where we are now”– (MT on Lex Friedman)

1) I don’t see how we need much more than neuromorphic hardware, so that we end the dependency on energy, performance, and pre-training. In other words, energy consumption of the current means of computation is an outstanding and unnecessary negative.

2) I don’t see how we are all that computationally limited at this point, versus that we’re limited in the experiments we can run to obtain the information necessary to perform computation, even if it’s Bayesian prediction – especially in the foundations of physics.

3) I do see that we have been running up against collective economic, social, political, and geostrategic adaptation to change with regularity at least since the industrial revolution, with a brief interlude after the world wars through the eighties.

Interesting if you think otherwise.

Thanks for all the work you do for all of us. 😉