James (all) Conservatism is stated morally instead of scientifically and legally

James (all)
Conservatism is stated morally instead of scientifically and legally, while the marxist sequence is stated pseudoscientifically and with sophistry as a fraud. We can (I have) state conservatism as what it consists of doing not of what it claims to morally value: self determination and self determined means, sovereignty and reciprocity, duty before self and truth before face, judged by empirical evidence, in the commonality of dispute resolution by the common law, and concurrency in legislative contract. If you don’t know what commonality in law, and concurrency in voting (legislation) mean then you don’t grasp that they are empirical requirements for the prohibition of authority.