(e) Actions are informationally more complete than words.
(f) And we must falsify BOTH words and actions.
(g) There are no such things as ‘ontological proofs’ in and of themselves that are other than meaningless tautologies.
It’s all just sophistry inherited from scripturalism.
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-03 20:46:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1323728259675234306
Reply addressees: @ArguingFanatic
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1323727511608561665
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@ArguingFanatic (a) It’s not Godel’s it’s just his most recent restatement.
(c) A proof is a test of internal consistency of its axioms not external correspondence or operational possibility.
(b) Proofs test axioms and words. Theories test premises and actions.
(d) Logic falsifies not justifies
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1323727511608561665
Leave a Reply