One doesn’t ‘prove’ anything other than the internal consistency of an axiomatic

One doesn’t ‘prove’ anything other than the internal consistency of an axiomatic deduction. That’s what proof means. Instead we seek to remove all doubt by the use of evidence.

I have it. you don’t. And you don’t even know what proof means, adversarialism, or falsification.

Reply addressees: @dan52036 @arbutus_pointBC @AsaZernik @ashleyblair21 @InvisibleTL @littlebirdll