I’d like to discuss p-law with Dworkin and Epstein, I’d have prefer Scalia but i

I’d like to discuss p-law with Dworkin and Epstein, I’d have prefer Scalia but it’s too late.

I’d like to discuss mathematical platonism with Roger Penrose but I think the cat is out of the bag or getting there.

I’d like a round table with the women in math that I respect to ask why women understand what math is better than men, but why men do math so much better than women. I find this fascinating.

I’d love to debate Sam Harris because I know his weakness (failing.) And I’d like the world to be able to have that discussion.

I’d love to debate peterson on his use of literary suggestion vs going for stoicism as I thought he originally might. Only because I’d like the public to understand what he’s doing and what the alternatives are.

Or any of the other nitwits in the IDW, but since most of them are Jewish and it would result in serial humiliation, since they all use the same method of critique but have no solutions except more of the same knitting circle conversation.

Molyneux won’t debate me. I have a script and audio to put out that will end his rather ridiculous argument and explain why he fails in his arguments and resorts to the tactics he does. I’ve hoped he would engage so I could get him into reciprocity and testimony and away from his sophistry, because he’s a fantastic teacher – the best, with the best reach but it’s proven impossible so. you know. influence begs.

For historical reasons I don’t really want to debate any one at mises institute, particularly Walter, but I would if the opportunity arose. They won’t survive long – as I predicted -without transforming (as I recommended), and replacing the last generation of propagandists, and I’d rather that they get there on their own.

I want to debate Hoppe in order to demonstrate we solved social since in three generations. But he correctly views me as an arrogant american with no respect for hierarchy. I mean, I have respect for the queen. after that, it’s all just the art of the duel.

I don’t rally want to debate christians. It would be interesting to discussion logos with EMJ.

I’m in violent agreement with Duchesne and Macdonald