OUCH (KINSELLA) —“I should probably inaugurate The Libertarian Theory Podcast.

OUCH (KINSELLA)

—“I should probably inaugurate The Libertarian Theory Podcast. I know it would be poplar. And I don’t even want to make money. So no ads. But then, why bother. Nevermind.”—Stephan Kinsella @NSKinsella

Libertarianism is a sedating pseudo-moral sophism for those to ignorant, weak and cowardly, to organise militarily to create rule of law by reciprocity,under demonstrated interests, enumerated as property, and to insure it equally, producing a condition of sovereignty. Liars all.

—“So, you’re in favor of aggression? Hitting innocent people in the head with bricks, for example? Or not? Just to be clear.”—Stephan Kinsella @NSKinsella

I can’t tell if you’re trolling, intellectually dishonest, or overlooking the obvious. How can one claim action in defense of, and retaliation for, ir-reciprocity, is an aggression? How can one construct a condition of sovereignty and reciprocity, otherwise? Wishful thinking?

Reciprocity: Productive, Fully informed, Warrantied, Voluntary Transfer of Demonstrated Interests, Free of imposition of Costs upon the Demonstrated interests of the others by externality. This describes all property possible, not just intersubjectively verifiable, or subjective.

Which is how Rothbard, in typical fashion, leaves the door open for voluntary, but otherwise ir-reciprocal parasitism, by such means of blackmail, baiting into hazard, the sufficiency of volition alone, despite externalities, and plausible deniability of having done so.