4) There is no via positiva (justificationary) method in philosophy, science, or law other than the irrelevant (reductive).
5) P-law is purely falseificationary. It’s just exhaustively falsificationary, and requires warranty and liability.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-28 00:46:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243701063963889664
Reply addressees: @AboveIvan @KANTBOT20K
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243700649952514055
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@AboveIvan @KANTBOT20K 3) If it is testifiable, then the question is whether it satisfies the demand for infallibility for the context in question. If it satisfies the demand for infallibility within the limits of involuntary restitution, then one has spoken truthfully and reciprocally.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1243700649952514055
Leave a Reply