photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52868911_10156993334852264_597773997

photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52868911_10156993334852264_5977739970813624320_o_10156993334842264.jpg BOOK(S) STATUS

(Gary is shaming me a bit – rightfully)

There is no single-author program on this scale other than aristotle’s. While many authors have come to the same conclusions, only Hume, Kant, Hegel, Marx, and Heidegger attempted it with any degree of success. And it is this difference between the multi-author programs of the anglo world and the single author programs of the continental world that explain the difference between anglo scientific (specialization/market) and continental literary (synthesis/monopoly).

IF WE WERE NOT BEING INVADED by design to destroy our people via the kalergi plan they way other people have been destroyed by the semites, then I would be able to whittle away at these books like Hayek and put them out when ready. But the demographic pressure is forcing me to go against my intuition and nature. So it is what it is.Alba RisingWhy make it readable for normies? Let it be as concise and truthful as possible. Like a work of science. It’s up to everyone else (i.e. us) to help it permeate wider culture.Feb 17, 2019, 10:58 AMCurt DoolittleYOu talk as if that isn’t the hard part/Feb 17, 2019, 10:59 AMAlba RisingWe’re up to it!Feb 17, 2019, 11:00 AMPhilip SaundersWrite a doorstopper like The Wealth of Nations or Being and Time. A great mountain attracts the best climbers. Don’t water down the impact by spreading it over multiple small books of posts. You need to make a single blockbuster for maximum impact.Feb 17, 2019, 11:03 AMMartin ŠtěpánI really hope it’s not like Hegel. I’m just about to finish Phenomenology of Spirit and, well, I don’t get it.Feb 17, 2019, 11:07 AMCurt DoolittleIt’s like reading a novel and seeing the allegory except the novel is about psychology.Feb 17, 2019, 11:09 AMCurt DoolittleMost men write a series of books. Being in Time is only 589pp altogether. My first draft was almost three times that – which makes it impossible to edit, print, distribute, and sell.Feb 17, 2019, 11:10 AMMartin ŠtěpánI should have probably looked into the definitions being used because to me, it’s reading word salad.Feb 17, 2019, 11:11 AMCurt Doolittle(it’s just ‘silly german prose’ which is better than ‘silly bullshit french prose’)Feb 17, 2019, 11:11 AMCurt DoolittleThe books are clearly my voice and style. The difference is that I go through and ‘cut down’ the repetition, make the terms consistent, and fill in the ‘leaps of reason’, and try to organize as layers of an onion. I can do it but I get very tired after just a few hours of it.Feb 17, 2019, 11:12 AMPhilip SaundersWell if that’s the case fair enough. I just mean don’t piddle out with a 114 page Kindle download like many people seem to do these days.Feb 17, 2019, 11:13 AMCurt DoolittleThe courses are an attempt to cut the book so that I don’t have to provide background on every fucking thing, just write declaratively.Feb 17, 2019, 11:13 AMCurt Doolittleum… no. I can write 114 pages in a couple of days without much effort. At this point about ten to twenty pages a day (not close to rothbard’s 25). The problem is that my work evolved over time and I have to make it consistent and remove things I repeat often. So it’s just basically ‘editing’.Feb 17, 2019, 11:14 AMYiannis KontinopoulosWhy attempt to cut down the repetition? Repetitive stanzas make things memorable, and that’s how we got nice things like the IliadFeb 17, 2019, 11:28 AMCurt Doolittleif you read reviews of theoretical works it is one of the principle complaintsFeb 17, 2019, 11:31 AMYiannis KontinopoulosI know just kidding 😄Feb 17, 2019, 11:32 AMCurt DoolittleYiannis Kontinopoulos dick. lolzFeb 17, 2019, 11:32 AMAhmed RedaCAN’T WAITFeb 17, 2019, 11:46 AMCurt Doolittleyeah. and you’ll get it. you’ll go thru it, and you will say “i knew all of this already…” lolFeb 17, 2019, 12:08 PMAhmed Redaand I must spread the word about it…:’DFeb 17, 2019, 3:56 PMBill JoslinGary is awesome and holding you to account as it should be…. Fair warning – absence of citations in the book might result in a “personal visit” by Gary (afaics – he don’t mess around)Feb 17, 2019, 8:55 PMBill JoslinCurt Doolittle we got itFeb 17, 2019, 8:57 PMBill Joslin(f#ck normies – we’ll turn them into titans- we are already)Feb 17, 2019, 8:58 PMGary KnightI understand what you’re up against but we must be hardest most on our friends and those most capable.

If not you – who?

Finish the courses and then tackle citations.

It might not be you who completes the academic project.

You might just be a footnote in Propertarianism.

😏😉Feb 18, 2019, 2:11 AMBOOK(S) STATUS

(Gary is shaming me a bit – rightfully)

There is no single-author program on this scale other than aristotle’s. While many authors have come to the same conclusions, only Hume, Kant, Hegel, Marx, and Heidegger attempted it with any degree of success. And it is this difference between the multi-author programs of the anglo world and the single author programs of the continental world that explain the difference between anglo scientific (specialization/market) and continental literary (synthesis/monopoly).

IF WE WERE NOT BEING INVADED by design to destroy our people via the kalergi plan they way other people have been destroyed by the semites, then I would be able to whittle away at these books like Hayek and put them out when ready. But the demographic pressure is forcing me to go against my intuition and nature. So it is what it is.