photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51882926_10156982475267264_390036777

photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51882926_10156982475267264_390036777697542144_n_10156982475262264.jpg SHAMELESS PLUG: https://rangerup.com/Jack SanduskyCurt drops the Mic.Feb 12, 2019, 6:35 PMLuke LemmonBeing fully willing and capable of violent action while being opposed to it’s pursuit (Not to confuse it with it’s occasional need) is the definition of being meek. Being completely opposed to violent action in the face of its need is cowardice. It’s moral grandstanding hiding weakness. When the need to unsheathe our swords comes, the facade is uplifted.

This is my favorite thing you discuss. The necessity of being capable of violence in order to restore natural law. “The meek will inherit the Earth” as the Bible verse goes.Feb 12, 2019, 6:45 PMAlain DwightOnly the naive think words and feelings rather than ethical violence can counter unethical violence.

Antiviolence is like antigun. You can’t be. Only weapons enable disarming others. The question is: who should be armed and what should be constrained via violence?

So what violence does antiviolence oxymoron rhetoric support? Arguably the worst and most tyrannical kind (the state against its own citizens).Feb 13, 2019, 10:07 AMSHAMELESS PLUG: https://rangerup.com/