photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/50330795_10156923143907264_542541544

photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/50330795_10156923143907264_542541544436006912_o_10156923143902264.jpg USER INTERFACE FOR THE INSTITUTE’S APPJohn StoneState capitalism will end taxation. Public banking, public clean nuclear thorium plants, and public ownership of corporate shares will reap in enough profits for the state to make the state largely self-funded ending the needed for state parasitism on the individual to fund public programs like single payer or education.Jan 17, 2019, 2:21 PMJohn StoneAll your bank debt payments, energy bills, and utility bills will replace your tax bill to fund the state.Jan 17, 2019, 2:23 PMCurt DoolittleEven better, white folk are a for profit enterprise in the first place….Jan 17, 2019, 2:27 PMJohn StoneBig corporations that can de-platform you have a case made for us to partially nationalize by having the state own 49% of its stock to keep alternative viewpoints from being suppressed in violation of free speech.Jan 17, 2019, 2:30 PMNeil A. Bucklewwe must realign our concept of profit back in line with family.Jan 17, 2019, 2:50 PMJohn StoneMining should also be a state owned enterprise because it is in the national self-interest to ensure an adequate supply of stockpiled mineral resources to serve the needs of the nation. It’s a national security interest to make sure we have plenty of rare earth elements available to build high tech industry and maintain our position as a leader in science and engineering and bring the best minds to work here. If China and Russia control the world’s supply they dictate whether or not we will make progress scientifically and technologically. Those should be at least 51% state owned so that the drive for individual profits by private shareholders and owners is still in the system but with a corporate agenda more controlled by national security interest.Jan 17, 2019, 2:51 PMNeil A. Bucklewit seems to be lagging. i tried to register about an hour ago and it is still doing the loading screen.Jan 17, 2019, 2:52 PMCurt Doolittlesorry? Um. Possible we were doing some sort of update. but we’re hitting it pretty hard and no problems here. Try again and let me know?Jan 17, 2019, 2:57 PMNeil A. Bucklewno need to apologize, just letting you know about technical details.Jan 17, 2019, 2:57 PMCurt Doolittlethe famliy creates a compromise between the male and the female. End individualism and restore the family as the central unit of social, political organiziton.Jan 17, 2019, 2:58 PMCurt Doolittle;) hugsJan 17, 2019, 2:58 PMCurt DoolittleJohn Stone Um. ownership and management are two different things. The state is SHIT at running anything.Jan 17, 2019, 3:01 PMNeil A. Bucklewi am working on something that relates. part of it is that one cannot be a citizen until after marraige. i define citizen as a couple who have already raised a proven functional adult. once adult hood is reached(and proven). a person is considered a sovereign adult within the society. marraige is the pathway to citizenship, with the “trial” being birthing at least one child and raising it successfully. the citizen in this model is both parents as a complimentary unit. the real vote in life is not he talk, but what is done. if you raise an adult for the next generation, you have already made the most important decision for the future of your society. you have to earn your way to the higher benifits of citizenship over the sovereign individual.Jan 17, 2019, 3:05 PMNeil A. Bucklewnot sure if you have seen what i am writing about the Temple of Destiny.Jan 17, 2019, 3:06 PMCurt Doolittlein other words, you aren’t an adult until you’ve demonstrated it.Jan 17, 2019, 3:10 PMNeil A. Bucklewbasically, with just enough ceremony to force folks to take the time to think about it.Jan 17, 2019, 3:11 PMNeil A. Bucklewbut it is also tied with the idea of a vote being tied to what is actually done, not what is said.Jan 17, 2019, 3:12 PMNeil A. Bucklewif you have a family, you have voted for the future of your people. you have demonstrated interest.Jan 17, 2019, 3:13 PMCurt DoolittleNeil A. Bucklew otherwise you are a consumer and yuo have protection of rule of law, but you have no ability to use the organized violence of politics to impose your will upon others.Jan 17, 2019, 3:14 PMNeil A. Bucklewright! but being a consumer is not inherently wrong, it is just not connected with production correctly. the energy every other animal consumes is ultimately dedicated toward the future generations, a stream of genetic information over time. at the base physics level, we are not consumers, or producers, but transformers. we transform the material around us into the next generation. how we have fucked this up, is simply amazing.Jan 17, 2019, 3:19 PMNeil A. Bucklewwhen you get the time check this out, you will understand what i am trying to do, and may be able to see it as a device as i do, beyond the words.

https://theemperorofplanetearth.wordpress.com/2018/06/27/the-temple-of-destiny/Jan 17, 2019, 3:20 PMNeil A. Bucklewit is a work in progress…Jan 17, 2019, 3:33 PMJohn StoneI think we should do something similar to the Chinese system where after high school/college you can take the path of the private sector or the public sector. If you take the path of the public sector, you have to go through a meritocratic process that whittles down candidates to find the cream of the crop to eventually run state owned enterprises for the national interest or to gain experience governing municipalities, cities, counties, and states in order to run for office. It’s like an American nationalist civil service league, completely non-partisan only with national self-interest at heart. That would replace having a deep state whose informal role is to maintain vital national interests. So at the polls, you get a choice between someone popular or someone who has experience and in depth knowledge to run the state properly. They can also be hired by elected candidates to fulfill an advisory role due to their training and in-depth knowledge.Jan 17, 2019, 3:42 PMCurt Doolittlecant. state run industries produce terrible returns. and are alwars corrupt and provide bad service.Jan 17, 2019, 4:18 PMCurt Doolittlestate owned is something elseJan 17, 2019, 4:18 PMJohn StoneThat’s not always true. The Bank of North Dakota is a state owned public bank that is managed by someone who ensures that all of the banks investments are sound investments to maximize returns both for management and the state. The state does offer guidance to bank management as to the direction of where investments should be made but ultimately it is up to management to make the call and invest in a specific sector, enterprise, or individual. I personally do not know what drive typically dominates in these interactions in a public bank: what the elected officials want or what management (bank CEO) thinks is best to gain the best returns on their investment. Perhaps a middle ground is reached somehow. Nevertheless, the BND is an example of a state-owned and managed bank that has been successful and is still running after 100 years. How people are selected to manage an industry is also incredibly important. Obviously some selectivity is necessary to find the best candidates.Jan 17, 2019, 4:51 PMJohn John StephensDefinitely not mobile friendly. Just FYI. On Android, cannot get the “Apply” feature to work (see pic), although I was able to register on the site, update my profile, and even upload a photo.Jan 20, 2019, 3:41 AMCurt Doolittlethanks. we’ll work on it.Jan 20, 2019, 5:06 AMUSER INTERFACE FOR THE INSTITUTE’S APP