photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45461930_10156760583642264_131125817

photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45461930_10156760583642264_1311258179803283456_n_10156760583637264.jpg NO. ANIMALS AND AI’S DON”T HAVE AND CAN’T HAVE RIGHTS. WE ENACT NEGATIVE RIGHTS TO PROTECT THEM.Martin ŠtěpánAnimals are welcome to create rights for themselves, provided they can create a militia to protect them. I’m not too eager to say the same about AI, still a bit worried about phenotypical replacement.Nov 6, 2018, 4:33 PMWilliam J MullenThat “you can’t hurt them or kill them unless…” implies that they possess negative rights. Because they have no such rights, we can kill them with impunity, except to the extent that they are property and protected by the property rights of their owners.Nov 6, 2018, 4:34 PMCurt DoolittleThey can’t possess anything. we constrain each other, not them.Nov 6, 2018, 4:49 PMCurt Doolittlehence the importance of operational language and avoiding the verb to be, since it is literally impossible for a child, ai, pet, or domesticated animal to enter into a voluntary contract.Nov 6, 2018, 4:49 PMDaniel PerazaDoes this applies to females too,curt?Nov 6, 2018, 5:21 PMAnne SummersDoes anyone have rights outside of what the observer fails to or chooses not to challenge?Nov 6, 2018, 5:49 PMCurt Doolittleoh stop… lolzNov 6, 2018, 6:10 PMMarra McKinneyShouldn’t we protect endangered animals such as elephants and tigers from being killed by kneegroes and street shitting Indians? Tigers have killed plenty of Indians which I encourage.

I would rather have less subhumans and more animal diversity ie large mammals on land and ocean.

Diversity in wildlife is the only diversity I’d like to keep.Nov 6, 2018, 7:58 PMMatt TempleNature recognizes no rights. Rights are a purely human concept. Therefor animals have no rights.Nov 7, 2018, 4:32 AMNO. ANIMALS AND AI’S DON”T HAVE AND CAN’T HAVE RIGHTS. WE ENACT NEGATIVE RIGHTS TO PROTECT THEM.