Doolittle’s Analytic Anglo Law vs Land’s Synthetic Continental Literature vs M’s

Doolittle’s Analytic Anglo Law vs Land’s Synthetic Continental Literature vs M’s Jewish Critique vs Hoppe’s Kantian Rationalism. Different grammars. Different justifications[Many roads to Rome], same objective. But, of them which criticism and solution is most complete, and least open to interpretation and therefore most institutable as law? Then, once we have that law, where do we search for opportunities within it? That’s where you look for Nick Land.